Monday, November 17, 2008

Equal Rights Amendment


About the Equal Rights Amendment and why it's important:

When the 14th amendment passed in 1868, non-white and non-male Americans believed they had won equal rights for all. It soon became clear they had not, and the 15th amendment was passed in 1870, allowing non-white males to vote. This understandably outraged countless women, one of the most noteable being Susan B. Anthony. In 1872 she illegally cast a presidential ballot. She was arrested and fined. Three years later a judge ruled that staes were not required to allow women to vote. She and Elizabeth Cady Stanton worked to procure the right of women to vote until their deaths, never seeing the fruits of their labor. The National Woman Sufferage Association and the National Women's party finally spread enough awareness to get the 19th amendment passed and sent to the states for ratification in 1919. Amendments can be voted for by Congress, but 38 states have to ratify an amendment before it can be added to the constitution. The 19th amendment had serious opposition, yet it made it into the constitution on August 26th, 1920. Unfortunately, while the right to vote was a huge victory, it did not give women rights [equal to those of men].

In the year 1923, a woman by the name of Alice Paul wrote the first draft of the Equal Rights Movement which read, "Men and women shall have equal rights throughout the United States and every place subject to its jurisdiction." In 1943 she edited it to read, "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex." so that the wording would be similar to that of the 15th and 19th amendments. Finally in 1972, Congress passed the proposed 27th amendment and sent it to the states. Unfortunately this amendment recieved even more opposition that the 19th amendment had. Reform groups who had worked to give women special treatment in the workplace were afraid of women having true equality, Conservatives were scared of women having power, Anti-ERA groups were afraid that women would lose the right to be supported by her husband (Ironically, dependency on one's husband is a reason so many women stay trapped in abusive realtionships), privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld (Also ironic that they were concerned with privacy issues when the right to terminate a pregnancy is a privacy issue). Quite a few businesses and fundamentalist religious groups joined the anti-ERA bandwagon as well.

The Equal Rights Amendment had seven years to get ratified. It recieved 22 ratifications in the first year, but only eight the next year, and it continued to dwindle with only three the third year and one the fourth year. The amendment recieved no ratifications in the fifth year. In 1977, Indiana ratified the amendment, making the total number of ratifications 35. Unfortunately an amendment needs 38 ratifications.

The National Organization for Women convinced Congress to extend the deadline for ratification until 1982. It was all for naught however, because no other states ratified it. Itwas re-introduced into Congress in 1982, and has been just sitting there basically. There is hope yet, the actual 27th amendment concerning congressional salaries took 203 years to be ratified. The Congressional Research Service has agreed that since the 27th ["Madison"] amendment was written into the constitution after a couple of hundred years, the ERA can be written in without starting all over. In other words, The ERA still only needs three states to ratify it.

PS- Many polls in the 1970s showed greater support for the ERA among males than among females. Could it be, men are adversely affected by sexism too? The devil you say! (lol)

The Wage Gap

Believe it or not, there still exists a gender wage gap in 2006. In fact, the wage gap has only narrowed by half a penny every year since the Equal Pay Act in 1963. Economists claim that a woman with a degree earns over a million dollars less than a man of the same education. In the 60's a woman earned about 58 or 59 cents to every dollar a man earned. In 1996 women were earning 73 cents to the dollar. In 2004 women were earning 77 cents to every dollar of their male counterparts.When you add race to the mix, anyone who isn't white but especially females, the percentages become even more outrageous. In 1996 for example, African-American women were only making 67 cents to the dollar (the average for all women was 73 cents)

Quite a few groups claim that the wage gap is a "myth" and that "personal choices" are what really cause the gender gap. For example, they claim that women who have never had a child and put work above family make just as much as men do, well much closer, only a 10% margin. Forget about the fact that women are expected, even pressured, to have children and take care of family matters. And that a woman would be treated as a bad parent if she put her career over her family. Forget about the fact that men are laughed at if they are more concerned with their family than the company's profit. Men are not even allowed to take as much time off [as women] when their child is born.

The reason that businesses don't mostly hire just women is that they believe the ones that are paid less are less likely to hold the company's needs as a priority over their family. After reasearching the wage gap I've discovered that unencumbered women (childless) earn about the same as men. The wage gap only emerges today when women have children. This is because women's wages go down about 2% per child while men's wages rise for each child they have. This bias toward believing that fathers prioritize work over family needs while mothers pursue urgent family responsibilities is both why the wage gap exists and why men aren't running out to hire more women even if they could pay them less



These people also claim that women choose lower paying jobs and/or part time jobs with zero pressure from society, so they can have flexibility for their families (Ironic that in Florida, at least, the majority of doctors basically refuse to perform a tubal ligation on a woman who isn't at least 28 or has at least three children). If women wanted more money, these people say, they would go into computer sciences, medicine (except nurses of course), law, engineering, ect. They assume these jobs are more important because they are paid more. Is it not possible that the women dominated jobs have always been paid less? Men and women display different strengths when it's broken down into statistics, and so the male dominated jobs have always seemed "more important" to a male power structure. America is afraid to allow women more in writing than the right to vote, why would it respect female dominated fields; Or the still female dominated responsibilty to take care of anything having to do with family; or the fact that perhaps men would want to be more involved in their families' life? The opposition quotes, "Among adults working between one and 34 hours a week, women's earnings are 115 percent of men's." So! A man who chooses the 'wrong choice for his gender' also suffers...

A lot of people might be saying, "but why wouldn't busineses hire mostly women?" Well, they believe the ones that are paid less are less likely to hold the company's needs as a priority over their family. Women's wages go down about 2% per child while men's wages rise for each child they have. This bias toward believing that fathers prioritize work over family needs while mothers pursue urgent family responsibilities is both why the wage gap exists and why men aren't running out to hire more women even if they could pay them less

Myself, in a Nutshell


I'm an artist all the time. I question EVERYTHING. I love to learn new things. I always try to listen to all sides of a story or issue before forming an opinion.

I'm not concerned with upholding "tradition" or the status quo; I prefer to live my short life the way I want to. Most people don't understand me. But hey, I don't understand most people.

I'm a hippie, I'm a feminist, and I'm an advocate for children's rights. I just can't stand injustice and oppression. It's ironic, I want to help the world because I hate it...well, and because my precious little son deserves a kinder world. ;)

My career has to be something I love; money isn't important. I want my life to mean something by my standards, and by the standards of those I help.

Morality is really important to me. I'm not perfect at all, but I never hurt anyone on purpose. If it's called to my attention that I did hurt someone, it hurts *me*, and I try to do whatever I can to fix it. IMO, if you can help somebody but choose not to, that is hurting them as well. I am so sick of the selfishness, the mean-ness, the hypocricy of most people. I do have to say though, if someone attacks me for no good reason, all bets are off!

I'm a Druid. I actually believe ALL Gods and Goddesses exist, plus the Great Spirit which is the Lifeforce that connects Everything. The Celtic God(desse)s are the Ones of my ancestors, and I personally like to follow the teachings of Jesus, especially the part about treating children well. I haven't seen any other religious-type texts that even deal with howe to treat children. I believe there's meaning in everything